The OpenJDK as the default Java on Linux

Hi All,  (this post is x-posted to the java7developer blog and the ljc blog)

Recently I've received a bunch of private correspondence from people confused/worried over the change in the default Java packaging for Linux. For many Linux distributions, the official Sun/Oracle version of Java has been packaged up as the default Java for the platform. However, due to a recent licensing change, this will no longer be the case! So, is this a positive or a negative thing for the Java and open source ecosystem? Read on for my take on it :-)

Background

Dalibor Topic announced that With Java SE 7 and JDK 7 being released, and with OpenJDK as the official Java SE 7 reference implementation, that it was finally time to retire the non open source "Operating System Distributor License for Java" (DLJ).

What does it mean for me?

The knock on effect of this is that Linux distributions will on longer package Oracle's Java (== OpenJDK wrapped up in some proprietary bits and pieces) as the default Java. This can/will cause problems for some Java users initially as there are a smattering of bugs (especially in the Swing UI libs) still left in the OpenJDK that affect programs like PCGen. However, some Linux distributions had already taken this path some years ago, most notably Ubuntu and the last remaining bugs are being cleaned up pretty quickly.

Positive or Negative?

Overall, I think this is a positive step in the right direction for free and open Java on Linux platforms. This sentiment was welcomed by well known open source advocate Simon Phipps in a twitter post. The fact the the OpenJDK is now the reference implementation (combined with efforts to open up the issue tracker for the OpenJDK) means that means that a vast host of Java/Linux end users can now directly improve 'official Java' for all of us. 

I want the Oracle version!

Linux users who need to use the proprietary parts of the Oracle JDK 6 or Oracle JDK 7 binaries can of course as usual simply get the gratis download at http://oracle.com/java under the same terms as users on other platforms. However, if it is due to a 'bug' that is discovered I strongly encourage those users to submit a bug report to the OpenJDK project, so that any issues can be fixed for all of us.

Opinions and further questions are welcome!

Thanks,

Martijn

Dependency Injection in Java 7

Hi all,


So apart from recovering from a long bout of the stomach flu, enjoying good food again at a "Come dine with me" night (our parents would be so proud) and planning a rush trip to Vegas I've managed to get out a first draft of the Dependency Injection chapter for the Well Grounded Java 7 Developer.


Java 7 unifies some of the basic standards that the various Dependency Injection frameworks (Spring, Guice, PicoContainer etc) have, making it easier for developers to move between the frameworks as needed.


A reminder of what DI is with regards to Java[1]

The javax.inject package specifies a means for obtaining objects in such a way as to maximize re-usability, testability and maintainability compared to traditional approaches such as constructors, factories, and service locators (e.g., JNDI). This process, known as Dependency Injection, is beneficial to most nontrivial applications.

So without further preamble, here's a short section from the chapter, let me know what you think!

Inject annotation

The @Inject annotation interface can be used in three places to indicate where you'd like a dependency to be injected.  Below are the types of members that can be injected, in the order that they are processed at runtime:

1.   Constructors

2.   Methods

3.   Fields

You can annotate a constructor with @Inject and expect its parameters to be provided at runtime by your configured IoC container e.g:

@Inject public MurmurMessage(Header header, Content content)

{

    this.header = header;

    this.content = content;

}

In this case both the Header and Content parameters would be injected at runtime.  The specification allows for 0+ parameters to be injected for constructors, so injecting a zero-parameter constructor is still valid.

WARNING As per the specification there can only be one constructor in a class with an @Inject annotation, this makes sense as the JRE would not be able to decide which injected constructor took precedence.

You can annotate a method with @Inject and like a constructor, expect its 0+ number of parameters to be injected at runtime.  There are some restrictions in that injected methods cannot be declared abstract and cannot declare type parameters of their own[1].  The short code sample below demonstrates the use of @Inject with a setter method, a common technique when using Dependency Injection.

@Inject public void setContent(Content content)

{

    this.content = content;

}

This technique of method parameter injection is especially powerful when it comes to providing service methods with the resources they need to do their job.  For example you could pass a DAO argument to a finder service method that was tasked to retrieve some data.

TIP It has become a default best-practice to use constructor injection for setting mandatory dependencies for a class and to used setter injection for non-mandatory dependencies, e.g. fields that already have sensible defaults.

It is also possible to inject fields (as long as they are not final), however the practice is not common.  The syntax again is quite simple.

public class MurmurMessenger

{

    @Inject private MurmurMessage murmurMessage;

    ...

}

You can read further about the @Inject annotation in the Javadoc, where you can discover some nuances about what types of values can be injected and how circular dependencies are dealt with.

Cheers,

Martijn

A related Java Code Geeks Article

---

[1] http://atinject.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/javadoc/javax/inject/package-summary.html.
[1]  By this we mean you can't do  http://download.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/extra/generics/methods.html.

The Well Grounded Java 7 Developer

Hi all,

I've obviously not posted for quite some time and here is the reason why.....

It's been a long time coming, but I'm very happy to announce that Ben Evans and I have been contracted to write "The Well  Grounded Java 7 Developer" for Manning publications.  We've been spending the last month frantically getting the first few chapters out and a whole host of other book related activities, but now that I'm in full chapter writing mode I'll be adding regular posts to this blog.

A majority of my future posts will focus on interesting areas in this book and firstly I'd like to show a reworked extract from the new Date and Time API section.

Modeling Date and Time

The new API models time as a sequence of consecutive instants separated by fixed durations[1].  Java 7 maps these concepts directly on to classes, here's a more detailed explanation:

• The javax.time.Instant class represents a specific point on a discrete time-line e.g. January 23rd, 1996 at 09:00:00,0 UTC, the day that Java 1.0 was released.

• The javax.time.Duration class represents a section of elapsed time in nanoseconds, e.g. The 400 nanoseconds it takes for a PIC12C672-04 Microchip to execute an instruction set.

So as you can imagine, any point of time can be modeled by simply applying a Duration (positive or negative) to a starting Instant.

...

...

Calendering

With regards to calendaring, the main Calendar is ISOChronology, but other calendars such as CopticChronology and ThaiBuddhistChronology are supported.  The Chronology interface can be extended from to provide other implementations.

...

...

Timezone support

Timezone support is also provided via three core classes:

• LocalDateTime – Represents date/time without an offset or a time zone.

• OffsetDateTime - Represents date/time with an offset but not time zone.

• ZonedDateTime - Represents date/time with an offset and a time zone.

...

...

---

[1]               This phrase is almost 100% uplifted from an excellent early primer article by Jesse Farnham, see  http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2008/09/18/jsr-310-new-java-date-time-api.html for details

---

The book will be loaded with more in depth explanations and of course plenty of code samples.  If you're interested in becoming a reviewer then please let me know!